Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Les enseignants et la technologie

Bringing Teachers Onboard with Tech

Ed tech adoption isn't about forcing new technologies on teachers or wearing them down in an effort to obtain grudging "buy in." On the contrary. In order for any technology-centered education initiative to have meaningful results, according to Rushton Hurley, it has to be born of a spirit of collegiality, teamwork, and openness.
And, he said, it doesn't hurt to give teachers some time share their successes with one another.
Hurley heads up Next Vista for Learning, a project that provides free online media for educators and offers training on the use of video content in the classroom. He's also a frequent featured speaker on topics related to issues in education technology. Next week he'll be presenting at the FETC 2011 conference in a session focusing on technology adoption among teachers.
David Nagel: There's resistance from some teachers when it comes to technology adoption. How much of that has to do with the ways administrators and IT staff approach teachers?

Rushton Hurley argues that any meaningful technology initiative in a school is going to happen "in the teacher's heart first."
Rushton Hurley: Certainly some of this resistance is a function of leadership. The more top-down the approach to having teachers use technology, the greater the chance teachers will see it simply as a necessary minimum to meet or even an annoying requirement to avoid if possible. I believe that if something educationally meaningful is going to happen with technology, it happens in the teacher's heart first, and this is a function of seeing various possibilities, choosing those to pursue, and having time to explore with colleagues.
Nagel: You have a number of suggestions for getting teachers on board with technology. But what do you think is the top thing schools should stop doing right now and approach in a different way?
Hurley: I don't believe that technology sits apart from effectively addressing such things as teamwork and morale. I would suggest that those who lead staff meetings make time available on a regular basis for teachers to share the little things they are doing in very short chunks (one to three minutes), whether or not those things include technology. The idea is to get in front of the staff the creativity and successes happening all around them, and let that help them enjoy and celebrate the professionalism and talents of their colleagues.
It's wonderful to work with a staff for whom the dominant mode of communication is, rather than the complaints a vocal minority may be inflicting on the group, a celebration of exploring what's possible. Where I've seen this happen, the leadership communicates openly, finds time for teachers to work together, and can trust the staff to expect much of themselves.
Nagel: Sometimes the teachers who resist a particular technology initiative are right to resist it. How can they communicate that effectively, and what should administrators listen for?
Hurley: The key is what is happening with student learning. If a particular technology isn't or, given the circumstances, can't contribute to student success, then teachers and administrators have to take proper steps to identifying what would. This means working together to figure out if the issue is what the technology is or how it is being used. For the teacher, this means explaining what they are seeing (in detail and, ideally, with data) and being honest about the variables involved. For the administrator, this means focusing on how to help the teacher be successful and being honest about when the concerns are more about their commands rather than student learning.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Profil de l'apprenant - BI