Tuesday, March 22, 2011

5 raisons pour intégrer la technologie dans l'enseignement

Five Reasons for Integrating Technology

By Heather Wolpert-Gawron

3/17/11
We speak about the achievement gap between the different cultures in our schools. Meanwhile, however, many of the stakeholders in education have created a vast trench that lies between those who accept the inevitability of technology and those who still refute its place in our classrooms.
Policymakers demand our schools must reflect the 21st century, yet continue to deny schools the funding to do just that. Additionally, our districts block many of the online sites for collaboration from our schools.
It is fear that guides many of the decisions about educational technology: fear that we will be left globally behind by countries more committed to technology integration and also fear that our students will somehow be scarred its use.
Frankly, there are many reasons to avoid providing technology as a more common and frequent tool in education. However, as stated in "Strictly Ballroom," one of my favorite movies, "a life lived in fear is a life half lived." Fear cannot shut us down from our mission: to educate students for their future.

For the Naysayers

Here are some typical arguments against technology in schools -- and better ones for using it:
1. The legal issues are daunting: what if a student writes inappropriate content online? Answer: Our job is to teach them how to use the tools of the real world. After all, using a circular saw is dangerous too, but only through shop class have many students learned to build a birdhouse safely. So is it with technology. Parents and teachers must be a part of monitoring and modeling. It may be scary, but without teaching students about appropriate use, they will surely encounter exactly that which we are most scared of.
2. How ever will we train all those teachers? Answer: It's simple. Have teachers train teachers. Give teachers who know how the paid release time to be trainers during their contracted hours of those who don't know how. There are willing teachers on every site, at every district, teachers willing to take on hybrid roles in education that allow them one foot in the classroom and one foot working to improve the pedagogy and practice of those who need to learn. For those who train, they will, as a result, avoid burnout by being permitted ways to utilize their other skills, all the while helping other teachers improve their own 21st century knowledge.
3. Where does the time come from? How can we add more to a teacher's plate? Answer: How 'bout this? Don't. Instead, take something off teachers' plates rather than put more on. We have to prioritize, and including technology is too important. We can't continue to have teachers waste their time on the curricular needs of yesteryear. We need to redefine how a teacher spends their time during the day and redefine the curriculum of tomorrow.
4. Some students don't have access to technology at home so how can we expect them to use it for assignments? Answer: To this I say, many homes don't have libraries either, but we still teach how to read. The fact is that it's a school's job to step up to provide and instruct. Even though some students may not have access to a computer at home, the school needs to see its role in equalizing the differences between those who have and those who don't. It's also society's role to find a way to provide for those homes in a more equitable way or our country's children will be left behind. Some districts are already working in conjunction with phone providers and computer companies to help bridge this gap. Those districts should not be few and far between, but should be commonplace.
5. It's expensive. Answer: Nevertheless, we cannot afford to fall any more behind in our comfort and use of technology. Policymakers need to start backing up their demands with funds. Parents need to be a part of monitoring their student's use at home. Teachers must continue to develop the skills that make them the technology guides in the classroom. For as the gap gets ever wider, the money it will take to fill the divide will increase. We are already in the red. Our reluctance to think and plan ahead has already created a debt of technological knowledge.

Taking Action

We can't allow fear to dictate our progress, nor can we allow those who won't move forward to dictate whether we do move forward. We cannot allow policymakers to insist on adoption and not provide for it, or worse yet, tentatively provide it and not find bravery and support by those within education's walls.
Teachers need to be on the forefront of curriculum, not in its wake. We need to be leading the charge towards preparing our students for their future, not hindering our march towards tomorrow

Monday, March 21, 2011

La semaine de 4 jours...

Four-day school week passes first test

Scores from the state’s Measures of Academic Progress test show that math proficiency and reading skills have improved among first- through eighth-grade students in Two Harbors and Silver Bay schools, even though classes have gone to a four-day week.
By: Matt Suoja, Lake County News Chronicle
Scores from the state’s Measures of Academic Progress test show that math proficiency and reading skills have improved among first- through eighth-grade students in Two Harbors and Silver Bay schools, even though classes have gone to a four-day week.
The MAP tests showed improvement in all grades, except for seventh grade in Two Harbors, where there was a slight decrease in scores.
“Academically, it seems to be working,” Lake Superior School District Superintendent Phil Minkkinen said at a school board meeting Thursday.
He said discipline problems and absenteeism for both teachers and students also is down.
Minkkinen said the MAP tests were done at a different time of the year compared to other years, so correlation for the results is difficult to show.
Students will be taking Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment Tests later in the year, which will be another indication of how the school district is faring with the four-day week.
District principals say they have not seen a lapse in student achievements.
Pat Driscoll, principal at Minnehaha Elementary in Two Harbors, said she hasn’t heard any negatives from parents or kids.
“[I hear] pretty much the same thing,” said Brett Archer, principal. He said there have been focus groups done with students showing positive results, and that teachers are on track with their syllabi or ahead of the game.
Much of the same news came from Principal Joe Nicklay in Silver Bay. He said his community has been upbeat. He said teachers feel like they are on schedule and students are getting more out of the school day.
Others are not so sure about the four-day week.
“I hear things that aren’t quite that way,” said Dwight Moe, school board member. He said he heard that six students from North Shore Community School will not be coming to Two Harbors because of the four-day week.
North Shore is a charter elementary school in Duluth Township. Once students graduate, they either go to Two Harbors or Duluth for the upper grades.
Minkkinen said he wasn’t aware that fewer students were coming to Two Harbors because of the four-day week.
School board member Renee Saamanen said she hears a “surprised positive” from residents on the success of the four-day week.
Students have been given options to participate in other activities on Fridays during the school year.
Chris Olafson-Langenbrunner, the Community Education director who is also in charge of Friday events, said students are not using the school’s “Fabulous Fridays” program very often.
She said the district isn’t getting signups for anything that costs over $15, and that families are figuring out daycare options on Friday. The district is working on a plan for Fridays off next year.

Friday, March 18, 2011

Faire disparaître les interuptions en salle de classe...

Let Kids Express Themselves Rather Than Exasperate You

| Leave a comment | Recommend
Students Raising Hands.jpg
I previously wrote about my student James whose selective sneezing--always during whole-group instruction, never during small-group activities--gave new meaning to attention-seeking behavior. Yet as strange as the manifestation of James' need for attention was, the cause of it is quite common: teachers not calling on students when they want to be called on.
And students' reactions to this are often far more disruptive than "sneezing." I'm reminded of an exasperated elementary school teacher who asked me for help with a challenging student I'll call Oscar. The principal warned me that Oscar had been a "problem" in previous years too, so I expected to see a real monster. What I saw at first, though, was a kid who entered class with high energy but channeled it in constructive ways. In fact, he was the first student to hang up his coat, sit down, and get started on the opening writing activity.
Then it happened. After a few minutes, the teacher asked for volunteers to share their responses to the writing prompt. Oscar's hand shot up, but the teacher called on one of his classmates. The teacher then asked for another volunteer, and Oscar's hand went up again. But the teacher chose someone else again. This played out a few more times before the teacher said, "We need to move on."
And move on is exactly what Oscar did. Whether it was making faces to get laughs from classmates, swiping the stapler off the teacher's desk, or chanting "this class is stupid," Oscar was indeed a monster for the rest of my visit.
But the teacher had an "aha" moment when I shared my observations with her later that day, and she saw the connection between her failing to call on Oscar and him acting out. And now that she knew the cause of her problem, we were able to find a solution.
So what is the solution to the problem of kids acting out if you don't call on them? Well, you can't call on all students all the time. But you can give them regular opportunities to express themselves--and feel "heard" in the process--even when you can't give them class-wide air time.
Here, then, with a tip of the hat (or wave of the handkerchief) to Oscar and James, are a couple of ways to let students express themselves rather than exasperate you: 
  • Give students a chance to write down their responses to a question, while you circulate to acknowledge what they've written. (Instant response devices can be a good alternative if you have an interactive whiteboard; another option is to give students mini whiteboards to write their responses on and hold up for you to see.)
  • Give students, in pairs or threes, a few minutes to share their responses with each other. (This is akin to the Think and Pair stages of the Think-Pair-Share cooperative discussion strategy.)

Image by Avava, provided by Dreamstime license

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Peut-on réglementer l'utilisation des médias sociaux chez le personnel?

How far can schools go in regulating teachers' social-media use?

March 14, 2011|By Adrienne Lu, Inquirer Staff Writer
  • Mary Beth Hertz says that blogging…
Natalie Munroe, the Central Bucks East High School teacher who might lose her job because of her blog posts about her students, is the latest example of a local teacher dealing with the consequences of blogging or social media.
She is unlikely to be the last, though, as those in the first generation that grew up using social media are now old enough that some are becoming teachers.
Last year, Elizabeth Collins, an English teacher at the Academy of Notre Dame de Namur, a private all-girls school in Villanova, was dismissed after she wrote on her blog about a student's classroom presentation.
Munroe and Collins have joined a list of teachers and professors nationwide who have found themselves in hot water for expressing their views through blogs and social media. Both were critical of students, though neither used students' names.
Some educators who blog or use social media as part of their teaching argue that when done right it can provide tremendous benefit. They say students will need to be proficient and should learn to use such tools responsibly.
"When you look at the essential skills - problem-solving, critical thinking, communication, creativity - we're really preparing these students in essence for jobs that aren't even created yet," said Eric Sheninger, a principal at New Milford High School in North Jersey, who is considered an expert on social networking and technology in schools. "We need to do a better job of preparing them to think critically and authentically."
Some districts are doing that with guidelines for using social media, including discouraging teachers from linking to - or, in social-media parlance, "friending" - students on Facebook. But most in Pennsylvania have not, according to Jeffrey Sultanik, a lawyer who has represented dozens of school districts across the region. Sultanik said social-media policies raise legal concerns, including those involving the First Amendment.
School boards might justifiably regulate employees' use of social media when it interferes with the school district's work, he said. Boards could also ban social-media use that breaches confidentiality obligations or school regulations.
"The ultimate question is whether a public entity such as a school district has the right to mandate what people do off school property," Sultanik said.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Les 5 caractéristiques des gens qui réussissent

5 Characteristics of Successful People

By Steve Tobak | March 15, 2011
5 Characteristics of Successful PeopleIf you’ve been around long enough, you’re probably aware that most important things in life come about seemingly by accident, chance, or coincidence. Discovering what you were meant to do, meeting your spouse, finding an incredibly unique opportunity or a great job, that sort of thing.
Well, those events are not as random as you might think. Certain behavioral attributes increase the probability of these “happy accidents” occurring. And not only are these characteristics of successful people, they are, I believe, learnable or teachable.
First, here are some examples of what I’m talking about - how important things happen seemingly by accident - followed by five enabling characteristics of successful people:
Steve Jobs returned to Apple as part of its acquisition of NeXT. A year later, Jobs was once again running the company he co-founded and cleaning house. Eventually, the stars aligned for the greatest turnaround in business history. But Jobs returning to Apple was nobody’s grand design. It just sort of happened that way.
The way Bill Gates and Microsoft came to develop and own the rights to IBM’s PC operating system is so far-fetched you couldn’t make it up. Gates had been working on a programming language for IBM. When IBM mentioned needing an operating system, Gates referred them to Digital Research, but CEO Gary Kindall left negotiations to his wife, who wouldn’t sign IBM’s non-disclosure agreement. So IBM went back to Gates, who bought QDOS from a Seattle company and sold it to IBM while retaining exclusive licensing rights. You know the rest.
Yesterday I watched an interview with Rivers Cuomo, founder of alternative rock band Weezer. Cuomo described an 18-month stint working as a clerk for Tower Records as the transformative event that completely changed the way he thought about music. After that, he formed Weezer and the rest is history.
In Unusual Origins of 15 Innovative Companies, we saw that lots of great companies started out making products that had nothing to do with what they eventually became known for. American Express was an express mail company, 3M mined a mineral,Nokia was a paper mill, and Toyota made looms. Somehow, leaders of these companies found a way to achieve greatness.
As for me, everything that’s ever mattered in my life happened pretty much by accident. Meeting my wife, discovering the high-tech industry, a whole bunch of great job opportunities, even blogging for CNET and then BNET, were all chance events that essentially fell in my lap. Or did they?
Of course, none of this stuff happened purely by chance. Everyone involved in the above events had certain characteristics that ultimately weighed heavily on their actions and ultimate success. To me, it boils down to five attributes:
5 Characteristics That Enable Accidental Success
  1. Being opportunistic. That means taking advantage of opportunities as they arise, including a willingness to act boldly and decisively and to take risks without overanalyzing possible outcomes. Successful invention requires a lot of trial and error. That’s the mindset of an entrepreneur.
  2. Ability to network, schmooze, persuade. Not social networking, but old school networking. In fact, the actual definition of schmooze is “to converse informally, to chat, or to chat in a friendly and persuasive manner especially so as to gain favor, business, or connections.” That’s what opens doors.
  3. Having a can-do attitude. You can be presented with all the opportunities in the world, but if you’re a negatron - always seeing the glass half empty, the fly in the ointment, why it can’t or shouldn’t be done - you’ll never capitalize on any of it. You’ll be the guy who’s always saying, “I almost [fill in the blank]; I don’t know what went wrong.”
  4. Being genuine and open. Some people think BSers and those who sugarcoat the truth or tell people what they want to hear get ahead. Now that’s BS. Smart, successful people are attracted to those who are genuine and open. Being genuine entices others to open up and share their thoughts and feelings.
  5. Being inquisitive or searching for answers, how things work, a place in the world. This characteristic is difficult to explain or quantify, but I think it comes down to a genuine need to figure things out, understand how things work, or do something important. It drives certain people and, one thing’s for sure: we don’t stop until we find what we’re looking for.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

"Maths cast" in Vancouver

NCCE Wrap-Up: Math Casting and Digital Storytelling

| No comments | No recommendations
As the NCCE conference wrapped up on Friday, I attended sessions about how to use digital tools in math to create "math casts", and how to harness commercial and free, online digital tools to encourage students to tell digital stories.
Toby Beck is a 7th grade math teacher at Ridgeview Elementary school in Vancouver, Canada. In his class, he creates "math casts," which are screen captures paired with audio that explain math problems. Beck has created a slew of math casts on his own to help his students understand certain mathematical concepts at their own pace, since they can watch, pause, and rewind the videos as many times as they need to and whenever they need to.
Beck also requires his students to create their own math casts to demonstrate understanding of the concepts, reinforcing their knowledge by allowing them to teach the process to someone else and even personalize problems. For example, one student interested in basketball created word problems that found the mean of three different basketball players based on the points they scored in the last 3 games. Students can also upload their math casts into their e-portfolio and refer to it later, he said. Check out Beck's blog for examples of math casts made by students.
Beck's school has a strong focus on using technology in the classroom, which means that the students have access to the laptops they need to be able to complete these projects. Although the school does not have enough devices for a 1-to-1 computing environment, it has recently permitted students to bring in their own devices to help bridge that gap. Beck uses Microsoft OneNote as well as Jing to create the math casts.
Meanwhile, in Snoqualmie, Wash., Joe Dockery is working with his students atMount Si High School to create digital stories through Adobe Photoshop Elements and Premiere Elements, and other free, online digital tools. Dockery has headed partnerships between the high school and the elementary school in his district that pair students and ask them to interview and record each other, he said. He also offers dozens of tutorials on the subject on his website.

Monday, March 7, 2011

TCDSB à la une en EED

 

 

EDUCATION

Popular learning-disabilities program may get a second life

KATE HAMMER

EDUCATION REPORTER— From Thursday's Globe and Mail
Click Here
A program that takes a unique approach to learning disabilities by challenging students to retrain their brains is under review by the Toronto Catholic District School Board.
Trustees will vote whether or not to undo cuts made by a provincial supervisor to the program, known as Arrowsmith, and investigate opportunities to expand it at a board meeting Thursday.

MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY

Since the late 1990s when the TCDSB became the only public board to offer the program in North America, the learning system has become popular with parents, attracting out-of-district students at a time when school boards are battling declining enrolment.
But when a provincial supervisor took over the board in 2008 after a spending scandal, the program became an easy target because of its $175,000 licensing fee and skepticism it had received from the special education community.
However, supervision ended in January, the trustees have regained control and the program, which was in the process of being phased out, is back on the agenda.
Trustee John Del Grande, the author of the motion to revive Arrowsmith, said only 40 out of a peak 70 students at seven schools remain in the program.
“This used to be one of the highlights, the bright points, of our board because it’s unique in public education,” he said.
Arrowsmith exercises are built on a concept called neuroplasticity, which refers to the brain’s ability to change its structure and function. They represent a departure from traditional approaches, which generally involve compensatory methods such as letting a child with poor handwriting use a laptop or allowing a child with poor reading comprehension to take a test orally.
Through daily activities aimed at exercising weak neural pathways – such as tracing shapes while wearing an eye patch or recalling symbols – teachers believe students’ brains can be trained to overcome 19 specific learning dysfunctions.
“All I hear is fantastic reviews, I don’t know of a single student who didn’t benefit,” said trustee Sal Piccininni.
The program was started in Toronto about 30 years ago by Barbara Arrowsmith Young. Independent schools in Ontario, British Columbia, Saskatchewan and the United States offer it, but it often carries a daunting price tag.
The program’s popularity has been fuelled partly by parents’ frustrations with traditional special education. Most supports for learning dysfunctions limit student success because they “are bypassing students’ limitations instead of remedying them,” said Mr. Del Grande.
Half of the board’s 12 trustees are new and the other half have been under supervision for more than two years, so support for Mr. Del Grande’s motion is hard to gauge. On Wednesday, several said they needed more information on the program and the board’s finances before they could make a decision.
In the past, Arrowsmith has been popular among trustees, and a devout group of parents have become vocal advocates. Cora Westermann became one of them after her son, Brendan, spent his Grade 6 year commuting from their home in Uxbridge to attend Arrowsmith classes at Holy Spirit Catholic School in Scarborough. When the program was axed the Westermanns enrolled Brendan in a $17,000-a-year private school in Pickering that offered it instead.
In those two years, Brendan’s reading ability soared from a Grade 2 level to a Grade 8 level.
“It’s also brought up his self-esteem,” Ms. Westermann said. “He was calling himself stupid and Arrowsmith turned that around, it taught that he just had a different way of learning.”

Profil de l'apprenant - BI